"The half-life of methyl mercury in blood, which is assumed indicate the total body burden, is usually assumed to be about 50 days. In contrast, in children receiving thimerosal in vaccines, the half-life of ethyl mercury in blood was 7 to 10 days, or 1⁄7 to 1⁄5 as long as that of methyl mercury. Therefore, in the two-month periods between vaccinations (at birth and at two four, and six months), all of the mercury should have been excreted, so that there is no accumulation."
Clarkson, Thomas W., Laszlo Magos, and Gary J. Myers. "The toxicology of mercury—current exposures and clinical manifestations." New England Journal of Medicine 349.18 (2003): 1731-1737.
"We also measured mercury levels in the administered vaccines and found that the stated amounts from the manufacturers were accurate and that the mercury in the vaccines was exclusively ethyl mercury. The presence of methyl mercury in the blood samples therefore suggests that sources of mercury other than thimerosal contributed to the total mercury measurements.
A half-life for blood mercury was estimated using a 1-compartment model as described in “Methods.” The half-life of blood mercury was estimated to be 3.7 days for newborns, 2.0 days for 2-month-olds, and 2.2 days for 6-month-olds (Table 2). We also calculated the percentage of mercury that was distributed to the blood compartment at the time of vaccination. Assuming that 8% of the child’s body weight is blood, the estimate was 3.2% (95% CI: 3.0%–3.5%), lower than the 5% blood distribution for methyl mercury."
Pichichero, Michael E., et al. "Mercury levels in newborns and infants after receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccines." Pediatrics 121.2 (2008): e208-e214.
"Total Hg derived from im thimerosal is cleared from the infant M. fascicularis much more quickly than MeHg. The washout T1/2 of total blood Hg after im injections of thimerosal in vaccines is much shorter than the T1/2 of MeHg (6.9 vs. 19.1 days)"
Ulfvarson, Ulf. "Distribution and excretion of some mercury compounds after long term exposure." International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 19.4 (1962): 412-422.
"Expert consultation and data presented to the GACVS indicate that the pharmacokinetic profile of ethyl mercury is substantially different from that of methyl mercury. The half-life of ethyl mercury is short (less than one week) compared to methyl mercury (1.5 months) making exposure to ethyl mercury in blood comparatively brief. Further, ethyl mercury is actively excreted via the gut unlike methyl mercury that accumulates in the body."
WHO (http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/thiomersal/statement_jul2006/en/)
I respect your right to believe anything and don't want to waste my time to change your "beliefs". I can help you (or anyone else) only if you really want to know the "truth" behind the statements of these youtube researchers and other social media researchers. Otherwise, I do not want to interfere here.
Further, I have never denied that Mercury is toxic. It clearly is. Also, some vaccines contain sources of Mercury compounds which is a health concern. What I have explained is that the potential benefits of vaccines (including the usage of trace amounts of Thimerosal) outweigh any potential adverse effects significantly as per the current scientific knowledge.
Thank you for the explanation, however information provided by you is inadequate please do read this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210 this is not from a social media guru at the end this is what says “However, our knowledge on this subject is still incomplete, and studies are required to address the predictability of the additive or synergic toxicological effects of etHg and meHg (or other neurotoxicants).”
The very reason they have use such para is that know for sure how dangerous is this chemical is, so in the future if there is a research pointing its adverse effect these scientists will have a convenient excuse.
Now my friend this is the head of the FDA who testifying in front of the US congress https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2MNGwNAnis To save your time listen from 5.25 congressman asked her a question that is does this mercury cause Autism YES or NO WHAT DID SHE SAY? I cannot give an YES or NO answer.
So doesn’t that enough to know this is dangerous for the body.
Also the heavy metal toxicity will be in the body for several years any brain damage will be visible not in two or three months but in years to come.
This is what take place https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI39uRC2okA
This is the very scientist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I7AwWQmec who explain the adverse effect of this chemical and he is one of the very few who did explain about the adverse effect of this. I am sure you midget not spend one hour listing to this but this is the reality.
Remember there was only 3 studies that was conducted to find the toxcicity of Thimarasol in the world This is one from the Calgary university Canada https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHqVDMr9ivo
However there where studies to test vaccine effectiveness remember friend out of 24 studies 22 had been done by fraudsters like this http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/11/wanted-by-the-feds-poul-thorsen-who-helped-pull-off-cdc-vaccine-autism-heist.html
//so in the future if there is a research pointing its adverse effect//
If future research reveals that there's a causal effect of blogging on having brain tumors, I will consider stop blogging, but not today. Not even if someone posts a Youtube video claiming so.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210 it very clearly says
" our knowledge on this subject is still incomplete, and studies are required to address the predictability of the additive or synergic toxicological effects of etHg and meHg (or other neurotoxicants"
even though the knowledge on this subject is still incomplete you are ok to take thimerosal, in order to take it you do not need them to prove that its safe but in order for you to stop taking it you need them to prove it dangerous.
"The half-life of methyl mercury in blood, which is assumed indicate the total body burden, is usually assumed to be about 50 days. In contrast, in children receiving thimerosal in vaccines, the half-life of ethyl mercury in blood was 7 to 10 days, or 1⁄7 to 1⁄5 as long as that of methyl mercury. Therefore, in the two-month periods between vaccinations (at birth and at two four, and six months), all of the mercury should have been excreted, so that there is no accumulation."
ReplyDeleteClarkson, Thomas W., Laszlo Magos, and Gary J. Myers. "The toxicology of mercury—current exposures and clinical manifestations." New England Journal of Medicine 349.18 (2003): 1731-1737.
"We also measured mercury levels in the administered vaccines and found that the stated amounts from the manufacturers were accurate and that the mercury in the vaccines was exclusively ethyl mercury. The presence of methyl mercury in the blood samples therefore suggests that sources of mercury other than thimerosal contributed to the total mercury measurements.
A half-life for blood mercury was estimated using a 1-compartment model as described in “Methods.” The half-life of blood mercury was estimated to be 3.7 days for newborns, 2.0 days for 2-month-olds, and 2.2 days for 6-month-olds (Table 2). We also calculated the percentage of mercury that was distributed to the blood compartment at the time of vaccination. Assuming that 8% of the child’s body weight is blood, the estimate was 3.2% (95% CI: 3.0%–3.5%), lower than the 5% blood distribution for methyl mercury."
Pichichero, Michael E., et al. "Mercury levels in newborns and infants after receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccines." Pediatrics 121.2 (2008): e208-e214.
"Total Hg derived from im thimerosal is cleared from the infant M. fascicularis much more quickly than MeHg. The washout T1/2 of total blood Hg after im injections of thimerosal in vaccines is much shorter than the T1/2 of MeHg (6.9 vs. 19.1 days)"
Ulfvarson, Ulf. "Distribution and excretion of some mercury compounds after long term exposure." International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 19.4 (1962): 412-422.
"Expert consultation and data presented to the GACVS indicate that the pharmacokinetic profile of ethyl mercury is substantially different from that of methyl mercury. The half-life of ethyl mercury is short (less than one week) compared to methyl mercury (1.5 months) making exposure to ethyl mercury in blood comparatively brief. Further, ethyl mercury is actively excreted via the gut unlike methyl mercury that accumulates in the body."
WHO (http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/thiomersal/statement_jul2006/en/)
I respect your right to believe anything and don't want to waste my time to change your "beliefs". I can help you (or anyone else) only if you really want to know the "truth" behind the statements of these youtube researchers and other social media researchers. Otherwise, I do not want to interfere here.
Further, I have never denied that Mercury is toxic. It clearly is. Also, some vaccines contain sources of Mercury compounds which is a health concern. What I have explained is that the potential benefits of vaccines (including the usage of trace amounts of Thimerosal) outweigh any potential adverse effects significantly as per the current scientific knowledge.
ඉකොනො,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the explanation, however information provided by you is inadequate please do read this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210
this is not from a social media guru at the end this is what says
“However, our knowledge on this subject is still incomplete, and studies are required to address the predictability of the additive or synergic toxicological effects of etHg and meHg (or other neurotoxicants).”
The very reason they have use such para is that know for sure how dangerous is this chemical is, so in the future if there is a research pointing its adverse effect these scientists will have a convenient excuse.
Now my friend this is the head of the FDA who testifying in front of the US congress https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2MNGwNAnis
To save your time listen from 5.25 congressman asked her a question that is does this mercury cause Autism YES or NO
WHAT DID SHE SAY? I cannot give an YES or NO answer.
So doesn’t that enough to know this is dangerous for the body.
Also the heavy metal toxicity will be in the body for several years any brain damage will be visible not in two or three months but in years to come.
This is what take place https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI39uRC2okA
This is the very scientist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7I7AwWQmec who explain the adverse effect of this chemical and he is one of the very few who did explain about the adverse effect of this. I am sure you midget not spend one hour listing to this but this is the reality.
Remember there was only 3 studies that was conducted to find the toxcicity of Thimarasol in the world This is one from the Calgary university Canada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHqVDMr9ivo
However there where studies to test vaccine effectiveness remember friend out of 24 studies 22 had been done by fraudsters like this
http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/11/wanted-by-the-feds-poul-thorsen-who-helped-pull-off-cdc-vaccine-autism-heist.html
//so in the future if there is a research pointing its adverse effect//
DeleteIf future research reveals that there's a causal effect of blogging on having brain tumors, I will consider stop blogging, but not today. Not even if someone posts a Youtube video claiming so.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210
Deleteit very clearly says
" our knowledge on this subject is still incomplete, and studies are required to address the predictability of the additive or synergic toxicological effects of etHg and meHg (or other neurotoxicants"
even though the knowledge on this subject is still incomplete you are ok to take thimerosal, in order to take it you do not need them to prove that its safe but in order for you to stop taking it you need them to prove it dangerous.